In the last one:
to me the background stars just look like single dots, I think more variation in size and brightness would be better
the lens flare looks crappy to me, I think it might be the fact the edges are so sharp but not really sure.
The moon looks pretty good though
you really think that was good enough to cover in watermarks?
yeah what the fuck? That wasn’t there before!
Kuz I always wanted to go to another forum and use your graphics to pretend I’m good at it.
[quote=“Brolapse, post:23, topic:432548”][quote author=Frell link=topic=535257.msg3924732#msg3924732 date=1330113574]
you really think that was good enough to cover in watermarks?
[/quote]
yeah what the fuck? That wasn’t there before!
Kuz I always wanted to go to another forum and use your graphics to pretend I’m good at it.[/quote]
I’m selling the wallpaper for forum points on another forum
watermark is too compact, blocking a lot of the detail. Also, the planet doesn’t look like it’s ‘round’, it looks a bit flat all around.
also needs more lens flare
edit: if the forum you are referring to is what I think it is, you’re going to have to do a lot better to sell that for points.
[quote=“DEFET, post:25, topic:432548”]watermark is too compact, blocking a lot of the detail. Also, the planet doesn’t look like it’s ‘round’, it looks a bit flat all around.
also needs more lens flare
edit: if the forum you are referring to is what I think it is, you’re going to have to do a lot better to sell that for points.[/quote]
What is the forum you think I am referring to?
[quote=“Brolapse, post:21, topic:432548”]In the last one:
to me the background stars just look like single dots, I think more variation in size and brightness would be better
the lens flare looks crappy to me, I think it might be the fact the edges are so sharp but not really sure.
The moon looks pretty good though[/quote]
needs more lense flare brolapse