RandQm

#1

Seems to know a thing or two, and has a positive attitude. (Also, not sure who all is in the Vet Section, could we have a listing of members?)

#2

I’ll agree to this, he’s released a lot of his server work and provides a fair bit of help. He’d be a good role model with a few minor attitude changes.

#3

:\

Just to clarify, I know some of you can’t see the ones that are in the trashbin, but basically 90% of his recent posts have been spam or trolling.

#4

[quote=“Davidi2, post:3, topic:458146”]http://www.moparisthebest.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=542860

:\

Just to clarify, I know some of you can’t see the ones that are in the trashbin, but basically 90% of his recent posts have been spam or trolling.[/quote]I know vets who troll/have trolled far worse than him.

#5

[quote=“the elve age, post:4, topic:458146”][quote author=Davidi2 link=topic=561070.msg4094404#msg4094404 date=1346702836]

:\

Just to clarify, I know some of you can’t see the ones that are in the trashbin, but basically 90% of his recent posts have been spam or trolling.
[/quote]I know vets who troll/have trolled far worse than him.[/quote]That’s not a reason to give someone the position though. And he’s still trolling a lot, which is my point. That’s not my real reason for voting no though.

I guess my question would be - what is the reason to give him vet? I even look at his help answers, a lot of it not real help. It’s stuff like ‘thats client sided’, or very vague answers. Almost like he’s trying on purpose to look like he’s helping. I guess I just don’t see anything that would make me think he deserves vet. Ever since the position became more about ability and less about being a role model (ie, when the position was hidden), I don’t see anything about him that shows any above average skill or contribution. Honestly looking at a lot of his recent contributions (global object system and item management system), it’s things that have already been released in servers or other tutorials.

That’s my view on this guy at least, my vote is no but that’s all I’m going to argue on the matter now :stuck_out_tongue:

#6

I actually agree with you now David. Even though he releases his work and explains it, he trolls and jokes way to much and can go too far. It’s a no from me.

#7

can anyone point me to someone who “has above average skill or contribution” and does not troll occasionally?

Not voting on this one I don’t know the person.

#8

I doubt it Silabsoft, but like I said it’s because he doesn’t have either of those things going for him

#9

I voted yes simply because of the fact he trolls…

Nah I kid. But I did vote yes