Adobe Abandons Mobile Flash Development

In an abrupt about-face in its mobile software strategy, Adobe will soon cease developing its Flash Player plug-in for mobile browsers, according to an e-mail sent to Adobe partners on Tuesday evening.

And with that e-mail flash, Adobe has signaled that it knows, as Steve Jobs predicted, the end of the Flash era on the web is coming soon.

The e-mail, obtained and first reported on by ZDNet, says that Adobe will no longer continue to “adapt Flash Player for mobile devices to new browser, OS version or device configurations,” instead focusing on alternative application packaging programs and the HTML5 protocol.

“Our future work with Flash on mobile devices will be focused on enabling Flash developers to package native apps with Adobe AIR for all the major app stores,” the quoted e-mail says.

In the past, Adobe has released software tools for mobile developers that create a single platform programmers can use to make applications that work across three major mobile platforms: Android, iOS and the BlackBerry OS. While it’s seemingly easier than learning all of the native languages for each operating system, some developers have claimed a loss in app performance when coding in a non-native language that then gets translated into other languages.

The move indicates a massive backpedaling on Adobe’s part, a company who championed its Flash platform, which is installed on nearly all desktop browsers, in the face of years of naysaying about its use on mobile devices from many in the greater computing industry, including, famously, Apple Computer. Critics of Flash cite its instability and intense drain on batteries as serious drawbacks which makes Flash hurt mobile devices more than it benefits them.

Flash became a dominant desktop platform by allowing developers to code interactive games, create animated advertisements and deliver video to any browser that had the plugin installed, without having to take into account the particulars of any given browser. However, with the development of Javascript, CSS, and HTML5, which has native support for video, many web developers are turning away from Flash, which can be a resource hog even on the most advanced browsers.

Apple made its biggest waves in the case against Flash in April of last year, when Steve Jobs penned a 1500-word screed against the controversial platform, describing it as a technology of the past… Jobs and Apple disliked the platform so intensely, it has since been barred from use on all iOS devices.

Despite attempts to breathe life into Flash on other mobile devices — namely, Android and BlackBerry OS — Adobe has failed to deliver a consistently stable version of the platform on a smartphone or tablet. In WIRED’s testing of the BlackBerry PlayBook in April, Flash use caused the browser to crash on a consistent basis. And when Flash was supposed to come to tablets with Motorola’s Xoom, Adobe was only able to provide an highly unstable Beta version of Flash to ship with the flagship Android device.

“Adobe has lost so much credibility with the community that I’m hoping they are bought by someone else that can bring some stability and eventually some credibility back to the Flash Platform,” wrote software developer Dan Florio in a blog post on Wednesday morning.

The drastic reversal in Adobe’s mobile plans comes in the wake of the company cutting 750 jobs on Tuesday, a move prompted by what Adobe labeled “corporate restructuring.”

An Adobe representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/exclusive-adobe-ceases-development-on-mobile-browser-flash-refocuses-efforts-on-html5/19226

:rolleyes:

Excellent? :rolleyes: :smiley:

About time

On one hand it’s good because Flash is awful, but on the other hand there will still be flash content or sites that require flash for years into the future, and it’s one large advantage that Android always had over Apple… :slight_smile:

[quote=“Moparisthebest, post:4, topic:421075”]On one hand it’s good because Flash is awful, but on the other hand there will still be flash content or sites that require flash for years into the future, and it’s one large advantage that Android always had over Apple… :)[/quote]I have an Android phone and I don’t see any advantages for it having Flash. What do I need it for?

You know, it’s rare to come across a site that has flash and doesn’t have an iOS compatible fall back be it HTML5 or other. That is really it in regards to flash on a phone too, that is all that is usable, interactive flash content is horrible on a phone.

All the big video sites are completely iOS compatible, YouTube has been since the iPhone’s launch, the sites large enough to justify their own video player have also made themselves compatible with iOS. I’ve even noticed more advertisers have been creating regular, static fall-backs so they can still display the advertisements to those without Flash.

This is why Adobe has given up, iOS controls the largest share of mobile web traffic, so content providers have been pretty much forced to adopt.

Sure, it’s nice to have the option, but what exactly do you use it for that isn’t already being handled better via other methods?

Nothing good, but I do run across the occasional site that, for example, requires flash to be able to log in to it.

[quote=“Moparisthebest, post:7, topic:421075”][quote author=tL link=topic=523749.msg3814410#msg3814410 date=1321204822]
Sure, it’s nice to have the option, but what exactly do you use it for that isn’t already being handled better via other methods?
[/quote]

Nothing good, but I do run across the occasional site that, for example, requires flash to be able to log in to it.[/quote]

Why would those sites use flash to log it. That’s a horrible method of identifying yourself.

[quote=“Twilight_Sparkle, post:8, topic:421075”][quote author=Moparisthebest link=topic=523749.msg3815073#msg3815073 date=1321246333]

Nothing good, but I do run across the occasional site that, for example, requires flash to be able to log in to it.
[/quote]

Why would those sites use flash to log it. That’s a horrible method of identifying yourself.[/quote]

I don’t disagree with you, but I also can’t change the site’s. :confused:

Which sites use flash logins?

I had to fix a computer for a lady who’s bank required flash to login. I don’t remember the bank name…

[quote=“Moparisthebest, post:11, topic:421075”]I had to fix a computer for a lady who’s bank required flash to login. I don’t remember the bank name…[/quote]Sounds like the worst bank ever, damn.

[quote=“Speljohan, post:12, topic:421075”][quote author=Moparisthebest link=topic=523749.msg3823338#msg3823338 date=1321972015]
I had to fix a computer for a lady who’s bank required flash to login. I don’t remember the bank name…
[/quote]Sounds like the worst bank ever, damn.[/quote]

Hehe, I completely agree. I just found the bank:

https://sec.rivervalleycu.org/savings.html
The login page (login applet requires flash!):
https://secure.srtg.net/RIV_60/Common/SignOn/Start.asp

If you visit that on an iPhone or iPad, it takes you to their non-flash mobile version to log in.

It’s rare for a large site these days not to have a fall-back.

How does this security feature function? River Valley Credit Union has added a security component that uses biometrics to help verify your identity when you sign on to On-Line Banking. Biometrics is the measurement of physical characteristics to verify the identity of an individual. This security feature measures the speed and rhythm of your keystrokes as you type your user ID and password to establish your unique typing "signature" and then verify your identity. It does not record your actual password; it only measures HOW you type it.

o_O

[quote=“Mopman, post:15, topic:421075”][quote]How does this security feature function?
River Valley Credit Union has added a security component that uses biometrics to help verify your identity when you sign on to On-Line Banking. Biometrics is the measurement of physical characteristics to verify the identity of an individual. This security feature measures the speed and rhythm of your keystrokes as you type your user ID and password to establish your unique typing “signature” and then verify your identity. It does not record your actual password; it only measures HOW you type it.[/quote]

o_O[/quote]

And it could be done with javascript looks like. :slight_smile:

my bank of america account had a flash security page (shows some picture that you are suppose to identify as yours) for awhile, it also had a convenient I don’t have a flash alternative. It seems recently they removed the flash page entirely but picture still appears.

Holy shit IT WAS ABOUT TIME!

flash is a dying if not dead product. this made me happy to know that they are finally choking on their own failures. good bye flash!

quite funny to see a bunch of java applet advocates hating on flash