My newest build :D

#1

Motherboard: MSI 880GM-E41
CPU: AMD Phenom II Multi Core x4
RAM: 16 GB G Skill (Only Running 3328 MB Ram) (Anyone know how to make it run the whole 16 GB?)
OS: Win XP SP3
HDD: 1.120 TB

#2

64 bit OS

ahahahahahahha (backs up my first point)

#3

Why the fuck are people still using Windows XP

#4

What the actual fuck

Purchase yourself a 64bit Win7 license.

#5

You bought 16GB of RAM and you didn’t even know about the 32bit limit? Ha.

#6

Nah man I haven’t worked with computers since like two or three years ago… Didn’t really update my knowledge sorry… :wink:

#7

[quote=“zammyking111, post:6, topic:433046”]Nah man I haven’t worked with computers since like two or three years ago… Didn’t really update my knowledge sorry… ;)[/quote]Pretty sure the 32-bit ram barrier was broken 6-7 years ago

#8

O shit oh well… xD

But is it still a good build?

#9

you bought AMD so no

#10

I got windows 7 ultimate now :smiley:

And ur computer probably blows cock since you’re probably an intel fanboy fuck off faggot

#11

You’re going to bottleneck with your cpu.

#12

Intel IS superior though, example:

http://www.ebuyer.com/185941-intel-core-i5-650-3-20ghz-socket-1156-4mb-l3-cache-retail-boxed-bx80616i5650
MASSIVELY outperforms the £3 cheaper:
http://www.ebuyer.com/204939-amd-phenom-ii-x6-1055t-2-8ghz-6mb-l3-cache-socket-am3-retail-hdt55tfbgrbox
^ which is a hexcore, not quadcore.

#13

MORE CORES = MORE FUN.

AMD makes perfectly fine processors.

#14

[quote=“t4, post:13, topic:433046”]MORE CORES = MORE FUN.

AMD makes perfectly fine processors.[/quote]
Perhaps adequate, at a push.

#15

[quote=“eczema3, post:14, topic:433046”][quote author=t4 link=topic=535766.msg3917421#msg3917421 date=1329346890]
MORE CORES = MORE FUN.

AMD makes perfectly fine processors.
[/quote]
Perhaps adequate, at a push.[/quote]
um, if you think a hex-core processor is by any means NECESSARY for a gaming machine, you’re out of your mind.

#16

who mentioned gaming?

#17

[quote=“mormonman, post:11, topic:433046”]You’re going to bottleneck with your cpu.[/quote]Not if he’s going to game. CPU means jack shit in modern games, you could run a cheap dual core amd vs a 2600k, and the fps difference would be like 1 or 2 at worst in 99% of modern games.

#18

[quote=“Speljohan, post:17, topic:433046”][quote author=mormonman link=topic=535766.msg3917333#msg3917333 date=1329341661]
You’re going to bottleneck with your cpu.
[/quote]Not if he’s going to game. CPU means jack shit in modern games, you could run a cheap dual core amd vs a 2600k, and the fps difference would be like 1 or 2 at worst in 99% of modern games.[/quote]

2600k is a bad example though, it’s basically a 2500k with hyperthreading

#19

well i doubt he’s number crunching/doing research…

#20

[quote=“Speljohan, post:17, topic:433046”][quote author=mormonman link=topic=535766.msg3917333#msg3917333 date=1329341661]
You’re going to bottleneck with your cpu.
[/quote]Not if he’s going to game. CPU means jack shit in modern games, you could run a cheap dual core amd vs a 2600k, and the fps difference would be like 1 or 2 at worst in 99% of modern games.[/quote]
That’s actually very wrong. I had a GTX460 with some shitty AMD dual core thing, wouldn’t even get a steady 125fps on call of duty 4, upgraded my cpu and now I get 250 constant.