My newest build :D

[tL]

Well it depends entirely what you are doing with those processors.

It’s like taking an a new porsche 911, driving it in a straight line at 60MPH next to an older slower porsche 911 at the same speed and then concluding “Oh, so the new car must not be any better”.

Because you are only testing it against one limited situation. You would be ignoring the fact the newer car is more efficient, it can squeeze more power out of the same sized engine, it can manage it’s power better, it is more fuel efficient, it can accelerate quicker , handles better and has a faster top speed.

There are parallels with that analogy directly with processors. Energy efficiency, raw computing performance, the way it manages the power available to it, etc.

[sin21]

[quote=“tL, post:41, topic:433046”]Well it depends entirely what you are doing with those processors.

It’s like taking an a new porsche 911, driving it in a straight line at 60MPH next to an older slower porsche 911 at the same speed and then concluding “Oh, so the new car must not be any better”.

Because you are only testing it against one limited situation. You would be ignoring the fact the newer car is more efficient, it can squeeze more power out of the same sized engine, it can manage it’s power better, it is more fuel efficient, it can accelerate quicker , handles better and has a faster top speed.

There are parallels with that analogy directly with processors. Energy efficiency, raw computing performance, the way it manages the power available to it, etc.[/quote]
Fine, you win.

[deragoku]

The CPU is the jack dog feces in the modern Olympic Games, you can run a cheap dual-core AMD VS 2600K, and the fps difference in 99% of the modern Olympic Games in the worst case, such as 1 or 2.

[eczema3]

The CPU is the jack dog feces in the modern Olympic Games, you can run a cheap dual-core AMD VS 2600K, and the fps difference in 99% of the modern Olympic Games in the worst case, such as 1 or 2.

I don’t know what you just said, but AMD CPUs are terrible, but yeah they are cheap.

[The_Un-Named]

[quote=“eczema3, post:44, topic:433046”][quote author=deragoku link=topic=535766.msg3981442#msg3981442 date=1335312807]
The CPU is the jack dog feces in the modern Olympic Games, you can run a cheap dual-core AMD VS 2600K, and the fps difference in 99% of the modern Olympic Games in the worst case, such as 1 or 2.
[/quote]
I don’t know what you just said, but AMD CPUs are terrible, but yeah they are cheap.[/quote]

it’s a spambot that takes an earlier post and omits some words then posts

[Pwnd]

[quote=“eczema3, post:20, topic:433046”][quote author=Speljohan link=topic=535766.msg3917897#msg3917897 date=1329399420]

You’re going to bottleneck with your cpu.
[/quote]Not if he’s going to game. CPU means jack shit in modern games, you could run a cheap dual core amd vs a 2600k, and the fps difference would be like 1 or 2 at worst in 99% of modern games.

That’s actually very wrong. I had a GTX460 with some shitty AMD dual core thing, wouldn’t even get a steady 125fps on call of duty 4, upgraded my cpu and now I get 250 constant.[/quote]OH NO, CANT EVEN GET A STEADY 125FPS OH MAN I WISH MY BRAIN WAS ABLE TO INTERPRET THAT

[davidi2]

125 fps on prolly a 75 mhz refresh monitor for the lulz

[eczema3]

[quote=“Pwnd, post:46, topic:433046”][quote author=eczema3 link=topic=535766.msg3918047#msg3918047 date=1329415291]

[quote author=Speljohan link=topic=535766.msg3917897#msg3917897 date=1329399420]

You’re going to bottleneck with your cpu.
[/quote]Not if he’s going to game. CPU means jack shit in modern games, you could run a cheap dual core amd vs a 2600k, and the fps difference would be like 1 or 2 at worst in 99% of modern games.

That’s actually very wrong. I had a GTX460 with some shitty AMD dual core thing, wouldn’t even get a steady 125fps on call of duty 4, upgraded my cpu and now I get 250 constant.
[/quote]OH NO, CANT EVEN GET A STEADY 125FPS OH MAN I WISH MY BRAIN WAS ABLE TO INTERPRET THAT[/quote]
It’s not about what your brain can interpret, it’s the gameplay advantages you get at the different FPS levels.

http://wiki.modsrepository.com/index.php/Call_of_Duty_:_A_Study_on_FPS

[Speljohan]

[quote=“eczema3, post:48, topic:433046”][quote author=Pwnd link=topic=535766.msg3981985#msg3981985 date=1335387382]

[quote author=eczema3 link=topic=535766.msg3918047#msg3918047 date=1329415291]

You’re going to bottleneck with your cpu.
[/quote]Not if he’s going to game. CPU means jack shit in modern games, you could run a cheap dual core amd vs a 2600k, and the fps difference would be like 1 or 2 at worst in 99% of modern games.

That’s actually very wrong. I had a GTX460 with some shitty AMD dual core thing, wouldn’t even get a steady 125fps on call of duty 4, upgraded my cpu and now I get 250 constant.
[/quote]OH NO, CANT EVEN GET A STEADY 125FPS OH MAN I WISH MY BRAIN WAS ABLE TO INTERPRET THAT

It’s not about what your brain can interpret, it’s the gameplay advantages you get at the different FPS levels.

http://wiki.modsrepository.com/index.php/Call_of_Duty_:_A_Study_on_FPS[/quote]So the consensus is that the developers are incompetent. We already knew that.

[mormonman]

[quote=“Speljohan, post:49, topic:433046”][quote author=eczema3 link=topic=535766.msg3982031#msg3982031 date=1335390211]

[quote author=Pwnd link=topic=535766.msg3981985#msg3981985 date=1335387382]

[quote author=eczema3 link=topic=535766.msg3918047#msg3918047 date=1329415291]

You’re going to bottleneck with your cpu.
[/quote]Not if he’s going to game. CPU means jack shit in modern games, you could run a cheap dual core amd vs a 2600k, and the fps difference would be like 1 or 2 at worst in 99% of modern games.

That’s actually very wrong. I had a GTX460 with some shitty AMD dual core thing, wouldn’t even get a steady 125fps on call of duty 4, upgraded my cpu and now I get 250 constant.
[/quote]OH NO, CANT EVEN GET A STEADY 125FPS OH MAN I WISH MY BRAIN WAS ABLE TO INTERPRET THAT

It’s not about what your brain can interpret, it’s the gameplay advantages you get at the different FPS levels.

http://wiki.modsrepository.com/index.php/Call_of_Duty_:_A_Study_on_FPS
[/quote]So the consensus is that the developers are incompetent. We already knew that.[/quote]

I think its a conspiracy to get gamers to buy more expensive components.