HE MADE ARYAN
Regecks`
And that is what I would like to remember him from… Allthough the games he played with the community were something I would not like to remember.
My vote: NO untill I am 100% sure he has changed his act.
He’s also a law student! This = trustworthy!
Then again he’s possible also a pedophile.
A trustworthy lawyer? Sounds like Microsoft Works. Did you mean != ? 
I’d say give it a few days at least, good behavior and no child porn and then certainly.
[quote=“Moparisthebest, post:4, topic:181571”]A trustworthy lawyer? Sounds like Microsoft Works. Did you mean != ?
I’d say give it a few days at least, good behavior and no child porn and then certainly.[/quote]
few days? You can only lose your loyalty once… After that…
That is where regex is atm. When me and regex became kaitnieks.com moderators (at the same day) people were wondering why Algas… Isnt there a lot better members to become a moderator then Algas…
I still remember what regex did… And how he defended Xerxes and how they were bonded… If regex becomes a community contributor delete my posts in this thread… But I would like to remind everyone that he has not contributed in anyway for this community… All he has done is posted some immature/illegal pictures… he has not contributed in any how to this community…
No.
While I believe some of his posts have been good, I also believe that it should take more than just a few days for him to make it straight back to the top.
With regards to aryan: When was the last time you proactively praised the creator of VHS? VHS (video tapes) are a dead technology to most people; you don’t see anyone hailing the inventor of a now dead technology, so I don’t know why Aryan, a dead bot, should be the deciding factor that makes or breaks his chances to get back into this section.
alex \ says (12:32 PM): sry but look at list and tell me who has contributed in the past year uno, paste that ^ james%5F \ says (12:32 PM): more liek james%5F \ says (12:33 PM): who has logged in in the past year alex \ says (12:33 PM): hahahaha paste all of dat
I’m not sure that makes a lot of sense. The value of a contribution does not diminish over time, especially since it feeds ideas into new contributions. When is the last time you heard someone praise Babbage or the inventor of the original networking stacks? Both are old technologies… but would we be having this conversation without their work?
I never said that something old was worthless. I’m saying that an old contribution should not be used repeatedly to gain access to this section. I’m not telling anyone to forget about it for the rest of their lives.
Aryan has been the reason that he managed to get back up to Community Member last time; it has been used twice now.
I don’t think he should get to this level in the community again with that contribution alone.
Assuming that you think he should get here again with aryan alone, should I ban him again based on past behaviour?
I doubt you considered it in that way - it wouldn’t be very fair, would it?
I did not realise he had been in here before (I probably was not, then, since I can only see this section through modship).
I guess it depends then on whether he carries on posting helpfully… or at least porn-free.
These threads are always deleted before CC rank is given, just so everyone knows.
It looks like the general consensus is to wait and see, and I agree with that.
bump[br][br][size=1]Posted on: June 03, 2009, 08:07:36 pm[/size][hr]bump
shut up frank_, gobbling the meat pole.
is regecks back?
Banned for posting kiddie porn I believe.
wut be up with tha bumpin?
Yakman was asking a question… I don’t see a problem though
eXemplar and frank_ posted on the same day as me.
It was not I that did it.
[quote=“yakman, post:18, topic:181571”]eXemplar and frank_ posted on the same day as me.
It was not I that did it.[/quote]
Sorry 
Didn’t read the date
so…?