[quote=“sk8rdude461, post:21, topic:545067”][quote author=sinisoul link=topic=663945.msg4437885#msg4437885 date=1405661673]
If rep returns, derepping should NOT be a thing.
[/quote]
Why not? We could have a glorious return of threads like this: https://www.moparisthebest.com/smf/index.php/topic,539087[/quote]
I laughed so freaking hard at this.
I positive repped you when everyone negged you and everything turned their neg to me for repping you. loloololol
[quote=“sk8rdude461, post:21, topic:545067”][quote author=sinisoul link=topic=663945.msg4437885#msg4437885 date=1405661673]
If rep returns, derepping should NOT be a thing.
[/quote]
Why not? We could have a glorious return of threads like this: https://www.moparisthebest.com/smf/index.php/topic,539087[/quote]
completely your fault for being one of those fags that cared about rep.
I support this if we can get a proper system in place, otherwise fuck it.
completely your fault for being one of those fags that cared about rep.
I support this if we can get a proper system in place, otherwise fudge it.[/quote]
Mate, I wasn’t the person that posted that, my account was hacked at the time. No one believes it, but I don’t really care anymore.
It’s a funny thread regardless of it happening to my account or not.
completely your fault for being one of those fags that cared about rep.[/quote]
If people really don’t take into consideration rep, then it is better off not existing. Pretty stupid to implement a function if it’s just going to get abused and disregarded.
Which is why Sini’s idea is the best. If you’re repping someone you’re doing it because you like them and what they are doing on the forum, none of this clique bullshit where everyone doesn’t like you and decides to de-rep the shit out of you just because they don’t like you. Having negative rep is a bad idea.
completely your fault for being one of those fags that cared about rep.
I support this if we can get a proper system in place, otherwise fudge it.
[/quote]
Mate, I wasn’t the person that posted that, my account was hacked at the time. No one believes it, but I don’t really care anymore.
It’s a funny thread regardless of it happening to my account or not.[/quote]
good news it even made it to the legendary Fat Cookies Hall.
But yes, we need a better system in place. It was far too easy to get 200 rep because most people that were giving it out were giving it for stupid reasons or rep 4 rep. I like the idea of a single rep point per person, we would also have a 7 days cool down between reps meaning it would take a shit load of time to gain a large amount from a single person. I also don’t like the idea of derepping as you can tell in the past some of us would gang up on others and were able to drop people down to low - 0 rep.
Mate, I wasn’t the person that posted that, my account was hacked at the time. No one believes it, but I don’t really care anymore.
It’s a funny thread regardless of it happening to my account or not.
[/quote]
good news it even made it to the legendary Fat Cookies Hall.
But yes, we need a better system in place. It was far too easy to get 200 rep because most people that were giving it out were giving it for stupid reasons or rep 4 rep. I like the idea of a single rep point per person, we would also have a 7 days cool down between reps meaning it would take a shit load of time to gain a large amount from a single person. I also don’t like the idea of derepping as you can tell in the past some of us would gang up on others and were able to drop people down to low - 0 rep.[/quote]
Why limit it in the first place? Every other large forum board has no limit on it so why should we?
Mate, I wasn’t the person that posted that, my account was hacked at the time. No one believes it, but I don’t really care anymore.
It’s a funny thread regardless of it happening to my account or not.
[/quote]
good news it even made it to the legendary Fat Cookies Hall.[/quote]
Pepperidge farm remembers when it was Greeny’s hall of lols.
good news it even made it to the legendary Fat Cookies Hall.
But yes, we need a better system in place. It was far too easy to get 200 rep because most people that were giving it out were giving it for stupid reasons or rep 4 rep. I like the idea of a single rep point per person, we would also have a 7 days cool down between reps meaning it would take a shit load of time to gain a large amount from a single person. I also don’t like the idea of derepping as you can tell in the past some of us would gang up on others and were able to drop people down to low - 0 rep.
[/quote]
Why limit it in the first place? Every other large forum board has no limit on it so why should we?[/quote]
as I recall it was because frell was forever mad that I had the most rep.
The longer this thread continues, the more I realize how unnecessary a rep system is in this community. If this ever actually does get taken into consideration, just do the stupid thanking system for posts and threads.
good news it even made it to the legendary Fat Cookies Hall.
But yes, we need a better system in place. It was far too easy to get 200 rep because most people that were giving it out were giving it for stupid reasons or rep 4 rep. I like the idea of a single rep point per person, we would also have a 7 days cool down between reps meaning it would take a shit load of time to gain a large amount from a single person. I also don’t like the idea of derepping as you can tell in the past some of us would gang up on others and were able to drop people down to low - 0 rep.
[/quote]
Why limit it in the first place? Every other large forum board has no limit on it so why should we?[/quote]