SotW?

#21

I sure hope so. Because the last time we tried this, it was chaotic:

EDIT:
If we are to do this again, I suggest a massive template update, because it was poorly designed. Somewhat like the one Frell did.

#22

I’d rather wait for Frell and SilentCJ’s inputs on it since they’re our resident graphics geniuses. It’d bring some activity to this board again though, which is a good thing.

#23

Seems silly to have a SotW on a site that doesnt allow images in signatures

#24

[quote=“Ruby, post:22, topic:521630”]I’d rather wait for Frell and SilentCJ’s inputs on it since they’re our resident graphics geniuses. It’d bring some activity to this board again though, which is a good thing.[/quote]Yeah, I would too. I wouldn’t want to instate this without consulting them about it first. They were the first ones to be controlling it (can’t remember if SilentCJ helped), so I’m sure they’d like to continue it. Yeah, that is a good thing, I love the graphics board, and I wish it were more active than it is.

[quote=“Davidi2, post:23, topic:521630”]Seems silly to have a SotW on a site that doesnt allow images in signatures[/quote]We could call it GotW.