*
I like it but the hexagon texture’s opacity needs to be decreased a little bit.
10/10 would bang
I’d like the original pl0x.
Original:
[quote=“RevengePK, post:5, topic:531704”]Original:
*[/quote]now show us a zoomed in one of the original 
Rule 7:
bad picsographic content is not allowed under any circumstances. This includes images, links, or deep-rooted discussions regarding watching, sharing, creating, or otherwise being involved with bad picsographic media.
Rule 7 is gay…
[quote=“Davidi2, post:7, topic:531704”]Rule 7:
bad picsographic content is not allowed under any circumstances. This includes images, links, or deep-rooted discussions regarding watching, sharing, creating, or otherwise being involved with bad picsographic media.[/quote]
The post was last edited by Si Force. So I don’t see anything really changing.
[quote=“sk8rdude461, post:9, topic:531704”][quote author=Davidi2 link=topic=650491.msg4371359#msg4371359 date=1380750997]
Rule 7:
bad picsographic content is not allowed under any circumstances. This includes images, links, or deep-rooted discussions regarding watching, sharing, creating, or otherwise being involved with bad picsographic media.
[/quote]
The post was last edited by Si Force. So I don’t see anything really changing.[/quote]considering the rule was changed after about a week of debate and was specifically decided to not allow ANY bad pictures like that including links like the rule says, and maybe si force wasn’t active when that discussion was had, I still pm’d him to reconsider
[quote=“Davidi2, post:10, topic:531704”][quote author=sk8rdude461 link=topic=650491.msg4371446#msg4371446 date=1380764669]
The post was last edited by Si Force. So I don’t see anything really changing.
[/quote]considering the rule was changed after about a week of debate and was specifically decided to not allow ANY bad pictures like that including links like the rule says, and maybe si force wasn’t active when that discussion was had, I still pm’d him to reconsider[/quote]
I understand. I was just saying that Si Force edited the OP. What was there previously, I don’t know. But that is all I know.
my guess would be it was a direct image and si force changed it to be a link instead, that’s what was happening before the rule change
Does it matter? Rules are being broken these forums without moderators caring anyway and it’s not like a we’re all kids. I’ve only just realized how much of a bitch the rules are, some of them that is. Not supporting some sort of porn section but I do support something like this topic. If kids view the forum and dont want to view a naked girl then they wont have to click the link but if they do then it is just as easy to search for it, Google is a kids biggest friend who wont tell on them.
He is pointing out how the moderating methodology is trash (which doesn’t necessarily mean the staff team are trash - just pointing that out before someone cries about me saying that [I’m not saying they are good nor bad]). The rules themselves don’t matter too much.
it’s not really that complicated or hard to understand that NSFW images themselves aren’t allowed on the forum in any form, and that was a decision made final by MITB. I dont see how applying an overlay to one of said images would make it an exception, but meh. And no, I wasn’t pointing out that the moderating methodology was trash at all, it’s not like it’s a huge deal
this should be deleted its totally against google adsense terms and conditions which is why rule 7 exists
Yep, I had completely forgotten about the rule change regarding this (my fault completely). This violates our adsense and the current rules, therefore I’ll have to lock this.